What is China doing that’s any different than what Tiger Woods is doing?
A powerful and dangerous force has been unleashed on the global economy. It’s a new source of skilled labor that has put American workers at a competitive disadvantage — and no one knows just how many jobs have already been lost because of it. The U.S. is running a huge trade deficit with this force; every year we’re spending millions more on what it produces than it spends on American goods and services. And to top it all off, this entity has built a massive currency reserve, investing large sums of it on U.S. government securities and thus enabling America’s fiscal profligacy.
Why, oh why, won’t the U.S. government do something to protect us from . . . Tiger Woods?
You thought I was talking about China, and I was. But I’m also talking about the modern-day golf legend. You see, China and Tiger Woods are a lot alike.
In seven out of the ten years since Woods burst onto the golf scene he’s been the top money-earner on the PGA Tour. He has forced his best competitors into second place while pushing countless players at the bottom of the heap out of the pro game entirely. He also has nudged athletes of all stripes from the lucrative endorsements market. He’s the best-paid corporate mascot ever, lending his name and likeness to General Motors, General Mills, American Express, Accenture, Nike, and more.
Such success both on an off the course has paid very well. Woods can’t possibly spend all the money he makes. (He took in 0 million from his Nike deal alone.) And what he doesn’t spend he either saves or invests, no doubt putting ample resources into U.S. government securities.
So what is Tiger Woods doing that’s any different than what China is doing?
Both are competing successfully. Both are earning more than they are spending. And both are saving and investing their wealth. If you think of Tiger Woods as his own country, he and China are just the same. Yet not a day goes by that we don’t read of some new political effort to throttle competition from China for the sake of the American worker and the American economy. Where are the initiatives aimed at protecting us from Tiger Woods? Think about that the next time a politician proposes protectionist legislation aimed at China.
Of course, pro golfers aren’t whining about being beaten by Woods. Rather, they know they must improve their games — or at the extreme, find new games to play. Competition is the lifeblood of sports, and the professionals accept this premise. At the same time, the consumers of sports — the rest of us who watch it on TV — insist on it: If there were no competition, sports wouldn’t be very interesting.
So why are American manufacturers whining about being beaten by China? And why do our politicians support these false notes?
Competition is the essence of business just as it’s the foundation of sports. That’s why we have antitrust laws; they’re an attempt to keep competition alive and well. And just as in sports, competition is good for consumers. It forces businesses to improve their products and keep prices low.
Yet there are people who understand all this in principle and still make an exception when it comes to competition from foreign nations. Why? There’s no fundamental difference between competing with someone across town or someone across the globe. Why the different set of rules for China and Tiger Woods, or for foreign and domestic competition?
One of the usual arguments against foreign competitors is that they are “unfair”; that they expect us to buy from them, but they won’t buy from us. China, it is said, is cheating us by building up an enormous “trade surplus,” which now totals over trillion.
But Tiger Woods doesn’t buy as much from America as America buys from Tiger Woods. In fact, Woods is no different than anyone who has ever succeeded enough in life to accumulate savings. China does just that and it’s a problem. But it’s no problem when Woods does it, or for that matter when you and I do it. We often hear that the “trade deficit” with China means that America has gone into debt to buy Chinese goods. But that’s no more true than saying we’ve gone into debt in order to watch Tiger Woods play golf.
Some of the goods we import from China are paid for with exports. In fact, U.S. exports right now are running at record levels. For the rest of the goods we import from China, we pay money. But that’s money we have earned, fair and square. Just because China sold more to us than it bought from us doesn’t mean there’s any debt involved.
Say you bought a pair of Nike’s because you thought that ad with Tiger Woods in it was so cool. Did you pay for your sneakers with money, or did you export something to Nike? Last I checked this isn’t a barter economy, so you probably paid money. But that doesn’t mean you went into debt for those sneakers.
The China-bashers also say that China’s investments in U.S. government securities are “unsustainable,” and they worry about what will happen to U.S. interest rates if those investments are liquidated. Well, suppose China took that money and started buying U.S. goods with it, instead of saving it. That means U.S. producers would have a lot of very profitable work to do. And that money wouldn’t disappear. It would simply change hands, and its new holders would ultimately have to invest it.
Perhaps China worries so many, and Tiger Woods doesn’t, because he’s an American and China is, well, China. But try this thought experiment: If Woods weren’t an American, would you feel differently toward him? Would you want to slap a targeted tax or other penalty on him? Or would you restrict Americans from doing business with him? Your answer is likely “no” to each of these. You love watching him play golf. And even his competitors know that if he wins and they lose, that he has raised the level of the game and made it a better business for everyone involved.
So why do so many endorse protectionist laws against China? Don’t these very same people love buying cheap toasters at Wal-Mart — toasters made in China? And don’t the American firms which cannot compete with China understand that the ascent of this new economic force has lifted the entire global economy, ultimately making it a better game for everyone?
When you think it through there’s only one sensible approach to trade with China: Go get ’em, Tiger!
Mail this post
Related Posts - Is thye political leadership a Myth ?? more cost than benefit ?? Elections? In this dreadful election season, many politicians have promised to "lead us into the future." I can hardly think of a worse fate for any society than to be led into the future by the political class of gangsters, marauders, looters, and liars. Even the most honest and well-intended among......
- My living Testimony on Jesus? My proof that Jesus is the Son Of G--? Love one another as I love you. Only then, will people know that you are my disciples. Why argue? If Jesus is G-- or of G--, does it change your Faith in Jesus? If the Holy Spirit is G-- or of......
- Do you like the book i wrote so far? I stared out the window as the rain poured down the thin glass panes of the cheap school windows. That was about the most entertaining thing that was available for me to do right now. Listening to Mr. Dally drone on and on about some war in history class was......
- Why do Canadians seem to assume Americans are pro-Harper and pro-Alberta (province)? This is what is mindboggling to me. I live near Washington, DC, USA and there have been 2 major Canadian events in the last 2 years: 1) Alberta, Canada represented in the Smithsonian Folklife Festival with lots of folklore and bison burgers and Molsen on a hot and humid July......
- How would I go about starting my own country? Let's say I raised enough money and enticed enough people for citizenship. It would be very low-profile, like Grenada or Micronesia at best and on unoccupied land. How could I go about declaring our sovereignty and such? It would be a constitutional parliament with a non-interventionist foreign policy. We would......
- Where can I find free or cheap stock ticker software for mac? I know this has been asked a few times, but I still can't find an answer. I just need a basic stock ticker app that I can slap on my desktop during the day, but it needs to work for mac. I have an E*TRADE account but I don't think......
- Is thye political leadership a Myth ?? more cost than benefit ?? Elections? In this dreadful election season, many politicians have promised to "lead us into the future." I can hardly think of a worse fate for any society than to be led into the future by the political class of gangsters, marauders, looters, and liars. Even the most honest and well-intended among......
- One Hundred Pushup Challenge -- Knee Push ups, 1 Handed Knee Pushups, and Full Push ups Well if you haven't heard by now then you aren't paying attention to the Health and Fitness blogosphere... Everyone is doing the 100 push up challenge at 100 push ups. It is a 6 week training program geared toward a final test where 100 consecutive pushups are completed. (My first......
- An Investment Average of 10% won't Guarantee Success An Investment Average of 10% won't Guarantee Success I saw a great advertisement released by my office's parent company today; I have never released what my office's parent company is...and I am not about to start now! Notwithstanding my obsession with privacy, I couldn't get over this info and felt like I......
- If you thought your ex was the paternal father what would you do? This one is complicated I'll try and clarify the best I can. I was dating this guy (Jake) and things were going great. Then my ex (Sam) started calling and begging me back and of course like most naive young girls I took him back. Naturally about a month later......
- How do i get him back? I can't believe im actually doing this... im usually the one giving advice to for relationships! i wish i could take my own advice. Okay so here it goes... I dated this guy Ryan for a total of 6 months, we're in high school im a sophomore and he's a......
- Monday Lotto AU 1million Tonight's draw is quite difficult to predict, but may be worth a few dollars. All numbers will probably be derived from the last 10 draws. 2 numbers out of the following 6 may feature: 3 8 23 24 27 42 12 games played in-house, with "Double up" feature, Cost: $6.05......
- Wednesday Lotto AU 750K Today's NSW Lotto is not a lot easier than Monday's. With most numbers looking to come from those within the last 10 draws, and at least 3 or 4 numbers from within 5 draws. Previous draw the Saliu ANY Filters were: 1+ 3+ 6+ 7+ 9+ 16+ All PLUS, strongly......
- My Ex-Girlfriend Of 3 1/2 Years Won't Let Me Talk To Her? My ex-girlfriend of 3 1/2 years won't let me talk to her...what should I do? We got together the summer before senior year of high school. The last year or so has been 5 hour drive long distance relationship. We didn't ever fight about being apart and we never let......

You really don’t know how to choose a good analogy.
Tiger Woods is a pro athlete who’s income is derived mainly from his endorsements from corporate sponsors. He is still taxed. He still obeys the laws. His currency is invested most likely, but invested in the general economy of which government securities are only one part.
Tiger Woods does not produce goods (other than entertainment). Tiger Woods is not in direct competiton with American manufacturers. Tiger Woods does not have his own currency, laws, or authoritarian government.
Also, Tiger Wood’s income is a fart in the wind compared to the economies of the US an China.
In other words, you’re comparing a golfing pro to a country. You might as well compare a baby to rock.
The reason why people are up in arms over China is that China isn’t playing fair.
Put simply, the global market works well IF the playing field is fairly level. This includes money markets (currencies) and trade regulations.
China keeps a death grip on it’s currency instead of floating it on the market. This keeps the currency at an artificial level, allowing for imbalanced trade in both goods and labor, not to mention lax labor laws.
If China isn’t going to play fair, then neither will the US.
To shoe-horn this into your analogy, Tiger Woods is cheating and the USPGA isn’t really stopping him from cheating. Do his competitors let him keep cheating, or take steps to stop him from cheating.
Nobody likes a cheater.
~X~
I’m not reading all of that because I couldn’t be bothered.
What
Surly you didn’t write all that to say you like the free trade and free enterprise system?
Build a better mouse trap and they flock to your door.?
the one thing you don’t touch on… China artificially keeps it’s currency low… because it’s a communist government…
that would be like Tiger Woods taking 5 shots off his score every time he stepped onto the green… if you know much about trade and econmics
in fact, the U.S. has had several "unfair trade" lawsuits against China due to this… how many lawsuits has tiger had against him for cheating?
that was a lot of talk, all the while… not saying a whole lot… impressive… good job on talking about things you don’t seem to know much about…
oh and the PGA has many regulations on the golfers to make sure they are all on the same level… not so much with U.S./China trade…
wow, that’s a bit much, ummm. I lived in China and consider my home to be the world. If you think being a golf legend is where its at, then you should play golf.
You cannot fight the changing tides, either adapt or get out of the way. You should not kick your competition while he tries to make his put. That’s obviously a red flag.